Life goes
on, and you might be surprised to know; so does Hardknott. We have plans afoot
to continue, perhaps against my better judgment, and will be involved with the
business of making beer for a while yet I hope.
We have
definitely stopped brewing at Millom. The brewhouse is just old, tired and in
need of serious upgrade. We simply cannot justify solving that where we are.
But we have some nice tanks and a bottling line. It seems there are people out
there who believe they could use them, and perhaps use me too. People who might
just be able to help me with the issue of lacking a decent brewhouse. It's all
top-secret, and I might even be jumping the gun by leaking this little snippet.
That
preamble is relevant however. As part of working out what to do for the future
I've thought long and hard about a number of aspects of the beer market. My
conclusions are that the British beer culture is still largely stuck with a
huge number of preconceptions, traditional practices and frankly stupid dogmas
that inhibit microbrewing from emerging out of the twentieth century.
I've
contemplated the issues regarding cask beer before on several occasions. As
part of my review I have considered cask very carefully indeed and have come to
some fairly decisive conclusions, key to it is the following point.
The vast majority of draught beer brewed by
brewers below 200,000hl/yr production is cask. The vast majority of keg beer is
produced by brewers over 200,000hl/yr production and these brewers produce
nearly no cask at all.1
Something
is very wrong with this situation, very wrong indeed. I do not think one can
understate how this is linked to another fairly important point.
Cask beer represents less than 10% of the total
beer sales in the UK and around 16% of the total draught sales. The remaining
84% of draught sales are keg beers and the vast majority of that volume is from
the big global producers.
The total
beer market is shrinking, partly due to overall reductions in alcohol
consumption but also critically due to changing customer preference to what are
seen as more artisanal products. Cask remains roughly static as a proportion of
the overall beer market. Cask in the free trade also appears to remain largely
free from dispense equipment ties and this is in itself an interesting
observation.
People like cold and fizzy
It is
undeniable that people like cold fizzy beer. Only the deluded would try to deny
that, and indeed it is important to note that contrary to the message CAMRA
have put out for years, people who drink keg beer are not morons simply
influenced by the advertising campaigns of large multinational brewers.
Drinkers really do prefer beer that is cold and fizzy.
The
artificial restriction of microbreweries largely to cask rather weakens their
ability to capture a larger market. If a drinker's enjoyment of a beer
experience is inferior under certain circumstances then that consumer is likely
to be swayed away from that situation.
I have long
pondered this situation. A long-time lover of the pub experience, brewer of
cask, keg and bottle beers, twice over publican, past lover of cask beers and
now a firm believer in keg as the future of great beer has come from
observation and thought about the whole market.
What is wrong with cask,
surely it's the best?
Have no
doubts, cask beer is technically easier to produce, needs less capital
investment and is less expensive to produce. It is ideal in many ways as a
method for a brewery to gain an entry to the market.
Cask beer
has a number of serious disadvantages;
- ·
Served at a warmer temperature
and with less "fizz" making it less palatable to many consumers (this
is true, get used to it)
- ·
The open container results in
the beer noticeably deteriorating in a couple of days (actually, in my
experience, a few hours)
- ·
The lack of carbonation
inhibits the demonstration of great hop aromas
- ·
Variability in the quality of
dispense resulting in brewer's beer not always being as they'd intended
- ·
Significantly more skill
required by staff to ensure quality is maintained
- ·
Poor cellar cooling and cleanliness
impacts on cask over keg
- ·
Due to significant over-supply
in the market the wholesale price of cask beer is very depressed
- ·
Simply not funky and trendy
enough for youngsters resulting in microbrewed beer losing out to trendy
spirits, fruit ciders and fizzy rancid grape juice from Italy
The dichotomy
The beer
market is still very much sliced in two by the terrible dogma instilled into
the culture of British beer. Whilst there is no denying that some changes have
been made and craft keg has become a thing, despite many people being sceptical,
it is still very much a niche and confined to craft beer bars and a few very
bold progressive pubs.
Mainstream
pubs generally have a number of keg fonts almost exclusively for multinational
brands. They may well, if free of tie, have handpulls serving locally produced
cask beer, if they serve any microbrewed beer at all.
Beer
drinking customers can be broadly divided into two types; the cask drinker, who
might default onto smooth-flow if desperate and the solid keg drinker who
wouldn't wash their socks in that cask stuff.
Admittedly,
there is a group of wise and discerning people who are much less blinkered, and
who will drink based on their mood, thirst, level of sunshine or just because
they are curious, but I'd suggest this group of people are in fact a small
proportion of drinkers.
The future really is keg
beer
A bold
statement you might think, and indeed it is only part of the future, but a very
significant part of it. It's not an easy road though. Much investment is needed
along with working out the route to market.
Equally
there is the task of convincing cask-only drinkers, who are only so in my view
due to the pressure from CAMRA, to love microbrewed keg along with gaining
trust of the keg-only brigade to try new beers. Changing that is likely to be a
bit of an uphill battle, CAMRA AGM voting continues to prove this point.
Not only
that, we have to tackle the stranglehold of the multinationals on the bar
front. Various "soft ties" that effectively prohibit microbreweries
from even being permitted to sell their keg beers to pubs in fact tie much of
the market even where a pub is apparently free of tie. This last point is
important. Many observers are getting their knickers in a twist about PubCos
and brewery owned estates forgetting that this is actually not the really big
issue we have to deal with.
And for Hardknott?
It is
almost certain that in whatever form we finally re-emerge we will be focusing
on keg much more than cask, very probably eliminating cask all together. For a
start, the most likely solution to continuing would be to join with an existing
cask producer thereby possibly forming a conflict.
My task
then for the next few months is to work out how to tackle the various barriers
to getting really great keg beers available and better accepted by the beer
drinking public.
I think a
return to a much more combative, confrontational and outspoken ethos for
Hardknott is required; there is a lot to change in the minds of the public if
we are to see microbrewed beers on keg fonts in many more regular pubs. I do
not think there is any good reason for this not to happen other than
inappropriate inertia emanating from a Luddite attitude.
-------------
1OK, so I expect I'll get some challenges here. Yes, there are the likes of Fullers and Marstons who put quite a lot of beer into cask, but even so, that vast majority of beer produced by breweries over 200,000hl/yr is keg beer.